BC on Autism Ep 26: Revisiting Burbacher 2005
There has been a number of people touting this paper yet only a few have really read it. Here's the paper in pictures. In short, only about half of the real experiment was done. I can't speculate why the authors stopped short, but I can say that their decision renders this paper almost worthless.
Running time ~ 10 min
Click here to get the QuickTime version
posted by Bartholomew Cubbins @ 1/12/2007 02:21:00 AM
5 comments
Subscribe to this blog
5 Comments:
This is rubish. Why do you waste your time making these meaningless videos?
So I can have meaningful dialog with someone who can't spell "rubbish". Or did you mean, "radish"?
This is exactly what I'd expect from a non-thinking, knee-jerking reactionary who quotes the titles and abstracts of articles that they've never read.
Try reading the paper and then come back.
This is rubish. Why do you waste your time making these meaningless videos?
Speaking of wastes of time...
Rube: (n) yokel, hick, yahoo, hayseed, bumpkin, chawbacon (a person who is not very intelligent or interested in culture)
Rubish: adj. Rube like. Easily conned.
See also Rube Goldberg/Thimerosal hypothesis.
nm - RG is actually quite appropriate for most low-brow autism research. If it's presented in a complicated enough manner, competence will be assumed.
<< Home